Osija
Mortal
posted 19 June 2003 06:20 PM
EDT (US)
4 / 41
well, compared to mine, as a newbie, it is.
aom dude
Mortal
posted 20 June 2003 01:54 PM
EDT (US)
8 / 41
Lol signalfires, nothing better than figthing evil with evil. Revenge is sweet especially when its crual and annoying, i love revenge.
Fobulous
Mortal
posted 20 June 2003 03:00 PM
EDT (US)
9 / 41
i met a guy who played Loki ( i was Odin) and the first thing he said to me was that he was a Smurf..so i pretended that i didn't know what he was talking about and said "huh?" he used LOL..anyway he was no smurf.. but he did get me a little nervous..but after i reached classical and found that he's still building his temple..it was all history from there hehe
signalfires
Mortal
posted 22 June 2003 08:20 AM
EDT (US)
19 / 41
Fair enough. And just to confirm that no, I have never played against you. I'm in the 1600's and the smurfs that I pulled the "lame crap" on claimed to be 2050.
signalfires
Mortal
posted 22 June 2003 02:32 PM
EDT (US)
24 / 41
It's all a matter of opinion. I mean smurfs disgust me; they force me to quit the game and lose points.
iam_Chrono_J
Mortal
posted 22 June 2003 02:40 PM
EDT (US)
25 / 41
At so, in retaliation, you act childish? Not a wise choice, sir. You should not expect to be treated well all the time. I don't really see anything unkind about smurfing. So, you lose a few points. So what? They're just numbers. Save your anger for something more worthy of anger. Getting angry over a silly computer game isn't very mature.
AgeMyth
Mortal
posted 22 June 2003 04:24 PM
EDT (US)
27 / 41
signal fire has a diff opinion about cheating obviously.
J_Bone
Mortal
posted 22 June 2003 07:44 PM
EDT (US)
29 / 41
Signalfires, I personally applaud you for taking action against smurfs. Maybe if they had enough droptiricking happen to them they would stay playing in the higher levels. The only thing is, how can you know for sure if they're a smurf or not? You can't check stats til after the game.
If the person I play has like a grand total of 7 games under their belt (stat-wise) and 100% win ratio they are a smurf in my book.
Mark_Aurel
Mortal
posted 22 June 2003 08:01 PM
EDT (US)
30 / 41
Well, in this case, they said they were. The question is really whether they said so before or after signalfires pulled his lame crap. Pretty much regardless of the circumstances, deliberately making the game lag, trying to pull the plug, using a lot of taunts - it's all lame. I think smurfing is, by itself, lame - meeting lameness with lameness doesn't strike me as a good idea, though - it just puts you at the same lame level. And to be proud of being lame? That's like a 2k player being proud he can beat up on 1600s. I find that for some players, having a lot of high rated names seems to make up for their lack of endowment otherwise. There's a lot of lamers like that - Glouk and KNlNE are excellent examples of such lamers.