lessthanjakeman9
Mortal
posted 30 May 2004 12:42 PM
EDT (US)
8 / 23
yeah definetly loki. Loki really does rule lower level play since people dont know how to counter the loki rush. Once you start getting up to 1700 on titans though you may need to stop rushing everyone and do FHs vs greek and eggy.
zBurito
Mortal
posted 30 May 2004 09:08 PM
EDT (US)
11 / 23
I have seen some really good gaias. I think people just give up too easy with her. Ive gotten 1700 with her easily, in a day. Its just about using her right. Set is also good just once he lost his GREAT animals the people didnt have it so easy and stoped using him. About who getting further... its about how good you are and how you can use them. Both are in top 15 so they can make it. Definalty both can make it to 1700+.
FriedPegasus
Mortal
posted 31 May 2004 02:44 PM
EDT (US)
19 / 23
I can't believe how many people think Odin is bad. He gets a great early bonus that makes him fast, he has the ravens that spot easy prey for him to raid, and in heroic+ an Odin player just needs to spam hillforts and hillfort units and his oppenent is trouble. All that plus he can save a lot of resources over time by having a self-healing army.
Aikidoka_Molinjir
Mortal
(id: Nike_Molinjir)
posted 31 May 2004 05:24 PM
EDT (US)
22 / 23
In my opinion, Odin is probably the better of the two, as he is more versatile. Loki has one good strategy: Rush.
Odin on the other hand, can rush, FH, and even somewhat boom much more easily.
Odin has the stronger eco, and the heroic bonuses. I personally perfer odin for everything except hesir rush.
Just my two cents.....