Silent_Assassin7
Mortal
posted 03 August 2006 09:52 PM EDT (US)
Would you rather have had the expansion how it was,.... or have the expansion add a new major god to each, greek, norse, and egyptian civs. For example, Greeks get a 4th god, and that god gets all unique gods from the other 3. Would you have liked that better or would you still chose the atlanteans as new playable civs?
Chris_69
Banned
posted 03 August 2006 10:08 PM
EDT (US)
1 / 3
that's a really good question, i would have rather seen a 4th god for the three civs than atlantis
Steve_the_Pirate
Mortal
posted 03 August 2006 10:30 PM
EDT (US)
2 / 3
Nope, i like it the way it is. If they made a 4th god per civ. then they'd have to redo everygod so its equal. OTherwise ud have to make a new minor god and that woudlnt be fair if that gods gets all this unique stuff thta no other god can. It would mess the gameplay up, and the campign would have to be completely new. Basically it wouldnt be a expansion, more like a AoM2 instead.
Silent_Assassin7
Mortal
posted 03 August 2006 10:33 PM
EDT (US)
3 / 3
when i meant unque gods, i meant that loosely. Like a unique mythic god(think Hera or Hel) Not an entire civ having unique