For example...
Against archers, would jarls or RC be better WITHOUT the sons of selphner...I know, husks would be better, but i want to compare jarls and RC.
Against Eles and camels, I know the natural counter is ulfs, but is a fully upgraded bragi ulf or a fully upgraded jarl better against them. and let's say the ulfs are better, are they really that much better to justify having a bunch of them that will pretty much be useless after wiping out the eles and camels.
against archers, is a sons of selphner RC better against archers than a fully upgraded husk?
are jarls with a bunch of TA better against archers than sons of selpher RC without the assistance of TA?
Also...how much better do fully upgraded jarls hold up to infantry compared to fully upgraded RC.
One reason i'm asking is because I like the strength and versatility of Jarls and if I could go with cranking out a bunch of Jarls and TA and not fool too much with the ulfs and RC i'd prefer that if that combo could handle the archers, eles and camels. Also, I've found sometimes if I go up against someone with a bunch of archers and I do a bunch of RC and wipe them out, then the RC are pretty much useless against everything else, but if I could wipe out the archers with the Jarls, they're still good against myth units and i'm assuming hold up against infantry much better than RC,especially with some TA backup, and i'm assuming good against eles and camels also. kind of same thing with ulfs against eles...you wipe them out then your ulfs are pretty much useless against everything else, unless your opp happens to have cavalry. Aren't they like the weakest infantry unit when going head to head against other infantry?