Kaziglu Bey
Mortal
posted 23 November 2002 06:32 PM
EDT (US)
5 / 12
Why remove even more of the game for DeathMatch just because some people want carnage rather than tactics or strategy? It doesn't make much sense for a game of this genre. Make a Quake 3 mod or something. Hundreds of free units on a huge battlefield with no terrain or resources. That'll be epic...
Kaziglu Bey
Mortal
posted 23 November 2002 11:19 PM
EDT (US)
7 / 12
Why would anyone have problems handling it when there is so much less to handle? It's you that want it to be even less demanding. I would prefer the opposite.
Lkysammy
Mortal
posted 24 November 2002 02:21 AM
EDT (US)
8 / 12
I play alot of deathmatch, but I wouldnt play it if they ruinedit like that. I like beating my opponent by outhinking them, not sitting back and watching 800 units duke it out. I like DM the way it is.
Lkysammy
Mortal
posted 24 November 2002 03:34 AM
EDT (US)
10 / 12
Yes there is. If u have 50 u wont be able to micro. I find that there are ebough units on the board as it is. GIving each 20,000 of each resource makes economy unecassary until very late. I like DM and I think most people agree with me. I doubt very highly they will change it much if at all.
alexanderTGII
Mortal
posted 24 November 2002 03:46 AM
EDT (US)
11 / 12
only people who can't play DM say there is not strategy to it.
Lkysammy
Mortal
posted 24 November 2002 03:50 AM
EDT (US)
12 / 12
I didnt say that. I said if they make the changes he is suggesting it will take LESS strategy than it does now. I love DM.