MaDsTer
Mortal
posted 19 January 2003 00:33 AM EDT (US)
Well i read everyones opinion tha anything that canot "rush" is'nt good.Well let me tell u something playing strategy game doesnt mean tha we rush.I have play and win many "rushers" who (if they can't win by rush) they do not know how to control a proper army.Anyway i think that we lost ,somewhere,the meaning of playing a strategy game
MaDsTer
Mortal
posted 19 January 2003 00:56 AM
EDT (US)
3 / 14
Playing Greeks most of the time (zeus), although hades is better for killing the rushers. I mean usually i can overcome the rush , if this happen and i ll keep andvantage in ages and tech then usually i win,since i think Greeks after a point they unbeatable (nothing is unbeatable,but in anyway they have the chances with them after a certain point)
MaDsTer
Mortal
posted 19 January 2003 02:32 AM
EDT (US)
5 / 14
Heh i used to play chess too,and be good at it.chess and rudh never go together as u might well know.Also an opening in chess can take quite a long while u can go to heroic ages in about ten minites in aom (lol thats not a good one comparison but what the heck).And if rush is an "opening" u should have the counter opening,which usually u dont as i read.In anyways one thing exists,lossing the fan tha a game provides