GoldenShadow
Mortal
posted 27 January 2004 06:52 PM
EDT (US)
9 / 32
With the new damage bonus agianst Turmas for infantry, it truly make Turmas ONLY good against archers and they get slaughtered by cav and now infantry just as bad. Now if the Atlantean player uses Turmas + cheirros, you can counter with cavalry. if they use Turmas + katas, you can counter with infantry. If they use any other combo not including the turmas, use your own archers.
IamDominique
Mortal
posted 28 January 2004 11:14 AM
EDT (US)
15 / 32
Isis will still be among the strongest. Gaia on the other hand will not. Imagine a Loki rush with a pletora of MUs - Gaia will die miserably to that even if the Gaia player's skill is higher.
Mikaiu
Mortal
(id: KOTD_Mikaiu)
posted 28 January 2004 05:55 PM
EDT (US)
21 / 32
why is everyone so competitive? its a GAME.
SeaBass
Mortal
posted 28 January 2004 07:38 PM
EDT (US)
23 / 32
What exactly makes Isis so bad now? Her monument range? Please, it was way to far reaching before. Her loss of 10% cheaper Age advance/SecretoftheTitans? 10% is 10%, not the end of the world. Ancestors loss of 2 attack? Well lets be fair it's a loss of 3 with Eclipse, but they could still destroy a TC, especially with a Sphinx or two, maybe now you have to build one more Sphinx to get that TC down, that's a good thing. You probably won't even need that extra Sphinx for an Atlantean TC, either.
Spook
Mortal
posted 29 January 2004 11:16 AM
EDT (US)
26 / 32
Yes but they also decreased Isis main rivals as well. Eggies might actually be viable in classic now vs atlanteans.
Chubbs4U
Mortal
posted 29 January 2004 12:54 PM
EDT (US)
29 / 32
its great watching all these "isis" players complain that she was nerfed too much....nothing like watching "bandwagoners" jump...