godfatha43
Mortal
posted 01 September 2006 10:05 PM EDT (US)
has anyone noticed that there really arent any good 1650-1700's? todays 1700 was last years 1640. it is so easy to pop on a rated game and beat some1 higher then u. the quality of players has dropped trememndously, all though the same # of experts are on aot. plz state u opnion.
Pdroo
Banned
posted 01 September 2006 10:15 PM
EDT (US)
1 / 19
Yes I know but what can we do about it?
Pdroo
Banned
posted 01 September 2006 11:03 PM
EDT (US)
3 / 19
As long as aom remains forgot by eso then the people playing it will gradually decrease... until theres a point where finding good games (or even just games) will be soo diffikult... and all people will leave.
Kang_the_Mad
Mortal
posted 02 September 2006 01:03 PM
EDT (US)
5 / 19
I know what you mean. I played a 1670 Loki player who didn't know how to link walls and advanced at like 6 minutes. He had like 4 hersir in archeic before advancing =/
SSJVegetaTrunks
Mortal
posted 02 September 2006 02:12 PM
EDT (US)
7 / 19
Why does it matter? Higher ratings still mean higher skills, and lower ratings still mean lower skills.
godfatha43
Mortal
posted 02 September 2006 03:12 PM
EDT (US)
9 / 19
yo kang, u talking about the 1v1 vs the_newb?. if u are, remember i hosted, lol. that was kinda cheap.
Pdroo
Banned
posted 04 September 2006 07:45 PM
EDT (US)
10 / 19
We all know more rating more skills either at 1300 level or at 1700 or w/e but what they say is true; todays 1700 was yesterday's lower... They mean that in the past more competitive games and people were available online
mbox
Mortal
posted 04 September 2006 11:55 PM
EDT (US)
14 / 19
I agree. There's also many players online that have 100+ games played, but none of them were rated. There was one guy who had played 250 games, and hadn't played a 1v1 rated ever. (or at least never won one.)