redstarz1
Mortal
posted 14 November 2002 10:58 PM EDT (US)
I just thought of this because I wanna know what most people play , Im sick of going to the advaced setup and seeing most people playing supremacy. why would you wanna play supremacy , its so boring when you have to look and kill animals and stuff and to me it doesnt involve more strategy like people say it does because people eventually catch on and start to kinda have the same build order anyways . I dunno it just makes me mad and I had to let it out. I play dm by the way.
redstarz1
Mortal
posted 15 November 2002 03:06 AM
EDT (US)
5 / 18
na , believe me I dont suck , I could play supremacy just as well as dm . I just dont like having to play for about an hour. Thats why I choose dm. 20 min is the most I want to play per game. I havent tried conquest yet though maybe ill give it a try soon and see if i like it.
Blotter
Mortal
posted 15 November 2002 07:45 PM
EDT (US)
15 / 18
Supremacy. Probably the biggest advantage it has over Conquest is that if you encounter someone who likes to hide to the very end, you can just capture all settlements and win. Or build a wonder. It's really a shame that we almost never see them, because they are so, well, wondrous!
Cen_X
Mortal
posted 15 November 2002 07:56 PM
EDT (US)
16 / 18
dm is so much better. Rm is slow, boring. All you do is farm and cut trees. Theres no fighting. I love armies and fighting and dm gives all that. Rm sucks so much. You barely fight. All you do is farm.