yes this really pissed me off!!!!
it has a downloadable review of a game and i download it and don't know how to get it going.also you have maps on this site i don't know what to do with.
Make the damded thing user friendly for us commputer iliterate people!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted on 12/24/03 @ 01:41 AM
IF THE DOWNLOAD GETS A WEBSITE FOR YOU INSTEAD OF A FILE: try not to use a download speed improvement program like getright... just turn it off.
IF YOU GET A .ZIP FILE: just open it and then unzip the file inside called *filename*.rec INTO the directory that mythology is in and under the folder SAVEGAME
Posted on 03/22/06 @ 07:56 PM
tell how to download this, in my comp says i gota buy this 40.00
Posted on 06/14/06 @ 03:54 PM
What program do u run the clip on?
Posted on 12/10/07 @ 07:03 AM
This is the wrong thing.... he just resigns in the classical age....no heroic age, no ancestors GP, no nothing ... very dissapointed...:(
Posted on 05/24/09 @ 10:21 AM
After about 3 minutes nothing happens , I reinstalled the game so know its version 1.00 but that was`nt the problem , so I don`t know why it doesen`t work , can you tell me ?
Posted on 12/05/09 @ 01:28 PM
(Insert Rating analysis here)
Loving made many mistakes (wasting resources on walls, building slingers despite BGM having no archers, failing to ensure a steady and sufficient supply of gold, not building enough spearmen and axeman, etc) but BGM's gameplay overall was really, really poor. His attempted rush was decent, but he didn't have the balls to finish Loving off so he fled, allowing Loving some time to turtle. At one point, as Loving's army was approaching BGM's main village, BMG's wood and gold resources were approaching 4000 apiece, yet his population was 75/60 and his army almost nonexistent. And all of his towers completely unguarded. It was nice when Loving f i n a l l y went on the aggressive (sure took ya long enough) and destroyed BGM, he deserved it.
[Edited on 12/05/09 @ 01:33 PM]
Khan And Steak
Posted on 12/16/09 @ 11:41 AM
Just wondering setisgay, why are you reviewing 2003 files? I'm not saying it's wrong - just odd ~ Khan