Yes, the qusetion is exactly that.
Does Experience count for anything on ESO?
Take the 2000+ players. I've checked their stats and I've found that they've played maybe 70-150 games ,maybe. But I've also seen players who have played 200+ games on ESO and are still hanging about a long way from 1900+. Maybe the experts started out on smurfs but as far as I know, EliteX started out as EliteX befor his two other smurfs. I beleive he has not played 100+ games. So does experience count for nothing on ESO? You will surely learn something after playing 200+ games.
Or is it because ESO is divided into two sections; the bandwagoners and the non-bandwagoners. When something new is tried by the top player, a whole lot of people emulate it and leap up the rating system, for at least a while. The skill of the banwagoner lies in emulation while that of his counterpart lies in true thinking and strategical abilities. A true genius in the bandwagon can be counted as the one who can beat back an expert non-bandwagoner who know what the bandwagoner is going to do.
The non-bandwagoners (lets call them nb's) have a ton of experience in versatile situations whereas most bandwagoner's have a series of game that mirror each other in the basic style of play and execution.
I beleive that an experienced palyer can truly rise up the order but why are they usually not where I suppose them to be?
The experts, once having attained their position, do not want to play too many games for fear of losing their position a s they will anyway be playing each other most of the time. That is understandable.
But this brings forth another question: How did they do this?
I would appreciate your thoughts and comments on this post.
Thanks.
Does Experience count for anything on ESO?
Take the 2000+ players. I've checked their stats and I've found that they've played maybe 70-150 games ,
Or is it because ESO is divided into two sections; the bandwagoners and the non-bandwagoners. When something new is tried by the top player, a whole lot of people emulate it and leap up the rating system, for at least a while. The skill of the banwagoner lies in emulation while that of his counterpart lies in true thinking and strategical abilities. A true genius in the bandwagon can be counted as the one who can beat back an expert non-bandwagoner who know what the bandwagoner is going to do.
The non-bandwagoners (lets call them nb's) have a ton of experience in versatile situations whereas most bandwagoner's have a series of game that mirror each other in the basic style of play and execution.
I beleive that an experienced palyer can truly rise up the order but why are they usually not where I suppose them to be?
The experts, once having attained their position, do not want to play too many games for fear of losing their position a s they will anyway be playing each other most of the time. That is understandable.
But this brings forth another question: How did they do this?
I would appreciate your thoughts and comments on this post.
Thanks.