"Since titans are talked about of es as "a new winning condition", would'nt it be a good idea to disable titans in conquest?"
The guy is right, check the ES site, Titans are considerd a victory condition no matter how easy you say they are to kill or hard. Going by the rules of conquest, titans should be disabled on it. (this is according to rules etc of conqeuest, titans are a wining condition, so truely they SHOULD be disabled no matter what you say)
The question is why would they bother. If es was to do this, there would have to be some reason or something behind it, because from previous occasions, it goes to show they wont do it for nothing.
Reasons? Well one maybe would be to correct Conquest, to make it how it should be, with only the victory condition of complete elimination/resignation of the other player. This would probably the main reason, but needs more support.
From many ppl I have talked to one AoE2 about aom, they really dont like titans, if there was a choice of play, with titans disabled, possibly more people would play the game if this was annouced that titans were disabled in Conquest.
Enough with the flaming post too please, damnit, talk constructivly, or dont talk in here at all. If you are against disabling titans in Conquest, state your reasons and why, or dont post here. Simply trying to put down the idea isnt helping anything. Saying things such as conquest is for noobs makes you look like the "noob", because you are not really making any sense labeling conquest for "noobs", just because maybe "noobs" are playing it at the moment.