I think that the gameplay in AOM will be much better than in AOK. I think GPs are the greatest change in gameplay.
If Barbie is so popular, why do you have to buy all her friends?
Everyone makes mistakes. The trick is to make mistakes when nobody is looking!
If CON is the opposite of PRO. whats the opposite of PROgress???
If jimmy cracks corn and nobody cares, Why the hell is there a song about it?[/b]
Example: I played a game. 2 vs 2. The host of the game had created a map and we played on it. The map was BF but it had a huge forest right in the middle of the map that seperated the teams. The creator of the map obviously had everything planned. He chose a certain civ (I forgot which one :P ) He created siege onagers and blazed through the forest and attacked. The game sucked because me and my teammate had no chance. We had never seen the map. In AOM, I could have shifting sanded him away or lightning stormed him or called a ragnarok and had my new hersirs attack them. In conclusion, GPs will eliminate having full proof plans before a game. The good players will make strategies as they go along.
If Barbie is so popular, why do you have to buy all her friends?
Everyone makes mistakes. The trick is to make mistakes when nobody is looking!
If CON is the opposite of PRO. whats the opposite of PROgress???
If jimmy cracks corn and nobody cares, Why the hell is there a song about it?[/b]